I've added support for DeepDyve to BioNames. If an article is available in DeepDyve, BioNames displays a link (see http://bionames.org/references/6952b806f87de2106669b2412043a4ab for an example). DeepDyve makes it possible to quickly check a fact (for example, the spelling of a taxonomic name). It obviously doesn't tackle bigger issues such as access to text for data mining, but if you just need to check something, or follow a lead, then it's an interesting and useful wrinkle on publishing models.
The first five minutes are free - renting articles on DeepDyve
Posted by Unknown
Posted on 2:57 AM
with 1 comment
I've added support for DeepDyve to BioNames. If an article is available in DeepDyve, BioNames displays a link (see http://bionames.org/references/6952b806f87de2106669b2412043a4ab for an example). DeepDyve makes it possible to quickly check a fact (for example, the spelling of a taxonomic name). It obviously doesn't tackle bigger issues such as access to text for data mining, but if you just need to check something, or follow a lead, then it's an interesting and useful wrinkle on publishing models.
DeepDyve - renting scientific articles
Posted by Unknown
Posted on 12:56 AM
with No comments
Today, scholarly publisher sites receive over 2 billion visits per year from users who are unaffiliated with an institution yet convert less than 0.2% into a purchase or subscription. DeepDyve’s service is designed for these ‘unaffiliated users’ who need an easy and affordable access to authoritative information vital to their careers.
Renting a paper means you get to read it online, but you can't print or download it, and access is time limited (unless you purchase the article outright). You can also purchase monthly plans (think Spotify for papers).
It's an interesting model, and the interface looks nice. Here's a paper on Taxonomy and Diversity (http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003602221172):
Leaving aside the issue of whether restricted access to the scientific literature is a good idea (even if it is relatively cheap) I'm curious about the business model and the long tail. One could imagine lots of people downloading a few high-visibility papers, and my sense (based on no actual data I should stress) is that DeepDyve's publishing partners are providing access to their first-tier journals.
Taxonomic literature is vast, but most individual papers will have few readers (describing a single new species is usually not big news, with obvious exceptions). But I wonder if in aggregate the potential taxonomic readership would be enough to make cheap access to that literature economic. Publishers such as Wiley, Taylor and Francis, and Springer have digitised some major taxonomic journals, how will they get a return on this? I suspect the a price tag of, say, €34.95 for an article on seabird lice (e.g., "Neue Zangenläuse (Mallophaga, Philopteridae) von procellariiformen und charadriiformen Wirten" http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00260996) will be too high for many people, but the chance to rent it for 24 hours for, say, $0.99, would be appealing. If this is the case, then maybe this would encourage publishers to digitise more of their back catalogue. It would be nice if everything is digitised and free, but I could live with digitised and cheap.